Compare AU
Compare MAUCA vs. A200
Compare shares and ETFs on the ASX that you can trade on Pearler.
Industry & Region
Country Exposure
MAUCA | A200 | |
|---|---|---|
Australia | 100.00 % | 96.56 % |
New Zealand | 1.24 % | |
Ireland | 0.80 % | |
Malaysia | 0.32 % | |
United States of America (the) | 0.05 % |
Industry Exposure
Key differences
•
MAUCA has a higher allocation (100.00 %) in the Materials sector than A200 (22.98 %).
•
MAUCA is only exposed to Materials (100.00 %). Comparatively, A200 is most exposed to Financials (27.20 %), Materials (22.98 %), and Health Care (9.84 %).
MAUCA | A200 | |
|---|---|---|
Materials | 100.00 % | 22.98 % |
Financials | 27.20 % | |
Health Care | 9.84 % | |
Industrials | 6.96 % | |
Consumer Discretionary | 6.29 % | |
Real Estate | 6.22 % | |
Energy | 5.82 % | |
Consumer Staples | 4.75 % | |
Communication Services | 3.92 % | |
Other | 2.43 % | |
Information Technology | 2.09 % | |
Utilities | 1.50 % |